Thursday, April 6, 2023

Example for demand driven but supply caused inflation

 

As an example for the demand-driven but supply-caused perspective, take airline tickets. When pandemic hit there was a total annihilation of demand and supply, as nobody was allowed to fly. Afterwards, supply partially recovered as operation of airlines was allowed, but demand was suppressed, as nobody really wanted to fly given the associated conditions. This state persisted until re-opening was in full swing. This brought rebound in demand and with it also dramatic increase in prices. This can be seen in following figures: left panel shows the development in quantity, while right shows the prices.


Is this increase in prices demand-driven or supply-driven? Clearly, this corresponds to a demand-driven increase in prices, given that in 2022 increase in prices coincided with increase in quantities. But does it make sense to assign increase in airline ticket prices to increase in demand? Sure, it did come as a result of the rebound in demand. But at the same time, the quantities remain well below their pre-pandemic levels, so they are not above normal, which means that it cannot be straightforwardly concluded that extreme prices are result of extreme demand.[1]

Rather, the story is probably as follows: re-opening led to normalization of demand, maybe slightly above normal demand. This was met with supply that was significantly lower than pre-pandemic normal, which can be seen in how the quantities flat-lined once their reached 85%. As a result, prices reached well above normal levels. While labeling inflation as supply or demand driven is straightforward, labelling it as supply or demand caused is somewhat harder. That said if one category has to be chosen then I would certainly opt for supply. Why? Because it is the supply which is further away from pre-pandemic normal.

The main point, then, is that with more refined terminology we can have both demand-driven and supply-caused inflation labels. We can say that the recent rise in flight ticket prices is driven by rebound in demand, but that the abnormally high flight ticket prices are caused by shortfall in supply.

I think this story of airline ticket prices applies more generally. What we have been observing since beginning of 2021 onwards has been normalizing demand hitting below normal supply, which led to above normal prices. Together with airline tickets it applies to many travel-related categories, albeit with some of them I would argue it is more about (temporarily) above-normal demand. It also applies to cars, where it is harder to argue that demand is higher than before pandemic. And in some sense it also applied to euro zone energy, where demand was abnormally low during pandemic, and then in rebounded to meat depleted supply; of course, later on a decrease in supply became dominant driver.



[1] Of course, lower than pre-pandemic quantities does not on its own imply that demand was lower than normal, because we also have to contend with the supply side of the story. Simply, output can be lower even with demand above pre-pandemic, if decrease in supply was large enough.

Is euro zone inflation demand driven but supply caused?

The big discussion now in macroeconomics is whether supply or demand is driving current surge in inflation. This being an empirical question, the answer is typically provided using an econometric models. I will have later a post on these empirical analysis, but first I would like to put a compromise proposal out there based on elaboration on the terminology we use: While inflation is to a large degree demand driven, it is at the same time mostly caused by supply.[1]

What do I mean by the destination between “driven” and “caused”? By demand driven inflation I mean that it is the increase in demand that was the force that is recently pushing prices higher. By supply caused I mean that the underlying cause of higher prices lies in supply.

How could this be true at the same time? Imagine that onset of the pandemic has brought a large drop in demand and supply at the same time, leaving quantity much lower but prices mostly unchanged.[2] And then imagine that demand gradually returns to its “normal” position, because the pandemic fades away, while supply fails to fully return to its normal position, because it is (temporarily) unable. You end up with higher prices and lower output than is normal.


What is driving/causing the higher prices, demand or supply? From perspective of recent development, which is movement from E’ to E’’, higher prices are driven by increase in demand, as that it the force behind higher prices. This is also confirmed by the fact that both output and prices increased at the same time. However, from broader perspective, moving from E to E’’, it is the supply which is the cause of higher prices: demand just returned to normal, while supply is still far from normal. Hence, the distinction between “demand driven” and “supply caused”.

I might be naïve but I think this distinction could to a large degree reconcile the two sides of the discussion. Why? I think each side focuses on different facts when making their case. The “demand driven” camp points out that output has recently increased and so did prices, suggesting increase in demand. The “supply caused” camp points out that output is still below pre-pandemic level while prices are higher, suggesting decrease in supply. Effectively, the two sides are focusing on different time scopes (or if you prefer, use different benchmarks). Using more elaborate terminology could help clarify this differences in focus and possibly eliminate part of the disagreement.



[1] I will ignore the aspects of inflation which are clearly supply driven, like energy and food components. There little disagreement over those.

[2] Another perspective would be that prices remained unchanged because of downward nominal stickiness, i.e. we were out of equilibrium.

Saturday, March 18, 2023

Addendum to "SVB was not a typical bank run"

Turns out that I could have saved my words on Wednesday, and rather than write a blog post, I could have shared a link to interview with Douglas Diamond of the Diamond-Dybvig fame:


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/economist-won-nobel-bank-runs-160025143.html


Huge credit to him for avoid the natural inclination to say "it is all in my models". This was far from DD bank run!